Tanzania first · built for wider travel discoveryTransparent costs · source-aware guidance · comparison
Review integrity

Traveller review verification policy

Reviews are useful only when readers understand what was checked and what was not.

Submission is not publication

A signed-in traveller may submit a review of a safari package, accommodation or operator. New submissions remain private and pending. Safari Ninja does not automatically turn submissions into public testimonials.

Verification and moderation are different

Verification asks whether there is reasonable evidence connecting the reviewer to the travel context. Moderation asks whether the review is suitable to publish. A review must pass both before it appears publicly.

Possible verification evidence

Evidence may include a Safari Ninja quote-request trail, booking or payment documentation supplied for checking, or another manual cross-check. A quote request by itself does not prove that travel happened, so it is only supporting context.

What Safari Ninja does not claim

A verified review does not mean every sentence was independently proven, and it does not guarantee future service quality. It means Safari Ninja recorded a reasonable basis for treating the submission as a real traveller review.

Conflicts and corrections

Operators or travellers may send supporting information if they believe a published review is materially inaccurate. Safari Ninja may add a public moderation note, unpublish the review, or request further evidence.